Here is a list of resources on the recent topic of interest (How to write a paper in a journal)
English 2 assessment for students registered in 2014-2015 will be based on coursework (four quizzes and ten assignments other than your ppt slides and oral presentation. ) and an oral Presentation only. There are no exams in June or September.
Older students (resgistered before 2014-2015) can take the September exam or opt to submit the coursework required in the following spring semester.
New reviewers (in peer-reviewed journals) evaluate the language as well as the science of the work published. Here are some questions they ask:
- Does the paper fit the standards and scope of the journal it is being considered for?
- Is the research question clear?
- Was the approach appropriate?
- Are the study design , methods and analysis appropriate to the question being studied?
- Is the study innovative or original?
- Does the study challenge existing paradigms or add to existing knowledge?
- Does it develop novel concepts ?Does it matter ?
- Are the methods described clearly enough for other researchers to replicate ?
- Are the methods of statistical analysis and level of significance appropriate?
- Could presentation of the results be improved and do they answer the question?
- If humans, human tissues or animals are involved, was ethics approval gained and was the study ethical?
- Are the conclusions appropriate?
To improve your research skills you need to learn how to write a critical review:
These are some questions you should ask about a text:
• Has the author formulated a research question/problem/issue?
• Is the question clearly defined?
• Is the significance of the question clearly established?
• Could the question be approached more effectively from another perspective?
• What is the author’s research orientation?
• Who is the intended audience for the text?
• Are main points adequately explained?
• Are comments adequately supported?
• Are the research/methodology/samples/tests/conclusions valid?
• Are measurements clear and sufficiently detailed?
• Is more (or less) data needed?
• Are arguments logically sound/interesting/relevant/timely?
• Is more information needed?
• What style/language/examples are used?
• Does the text contribute new knowledge/perspectives or contradict and refute existing views?
• What are the limitations of the text?
More personal perspectives:
• How does the text help me to understand the topic?
• What part of the text inspires me?
• How does this text relate to the research question I’m developing?
Here is a video on Protein structure we will be watching in class.
After listening to a radio segment describing the protein game Fold.it, answer the following questions:
1. What is Fold.it?
2. Fold.it is designed to answer a large biological question. What is the question scientists are aiming to answer? How is that a great challenge for scientists? Why (not)?
3. Is the game designed for scientists or laypeople? To what extent, is this facilitating its main objective?
4. (Optional) Make an account and write a brief review of the challenges you encountered or skills you improved.